<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (3) TMI 134 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168086</link>
    <description>Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act enlarged the Tribunal&#039;s power in dismissal and discharge disputes: it may reappraise the evidence, test whether misconduct is proved, differ from the employer&#039;s finding, and, where justified, substitute a lesser punishment. That power is confined to the materials on record and does not authorise fresh evidence. The provision was also held not to apply retrospectively to industrial disputes already referred and pending on 15-12-1971; those references remain governed by the pre-existing law. The resulting position is that the wider adjudicatory power under section 11A applies only to post-commencement references.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:34:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (3) TMI 134 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168086</link>
      <description>Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act enlarged the Tribunal&#039;s power in dismissal and discharge disputes: it may reappraise the evidence, test whether misconduct is proved, differ from the employer&#039;s finding, and, where justified, substitute a lesser punishment. That power is confined to the materials on record and does not authorise fresh evidence. The provision was also held not to apply retrospectively to industrial disputes already referred and pending on 15-12-1971; those references remain governed by the pre-existing law. The resulting position is that the wider adjudicatory power under section 11A applies only to post-commencement references.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>