<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 772 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168084</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee-revisionist, holding that for a single delivery of goods in one quarter of a financial year, separate form Cs were not required, and a single form C was adequate. The impugned orders were set aside, directing the assessing authority to issue a fresh order considering the transaction covered by a single form C. The revision was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 08:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 772 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168084</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee-revisionist, holding that for a single delivery of goods in one quarter of a financial year, separate form Cs were not required, and a single form C was adequate. The impugned orders were set aside, directing the assessing authority to issue a fresh order considering the transaction covered by a single form C. The revision was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>