https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168078 The disputed turnover was supported by bills and vouchers, and the Revenue's own communication indicated an intra-State sale. The Tax Board did not itself finally determine tax liability; it remanded the matter for de novo assessment after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The Rajasthan High Court found no perversity or legal error in that course and held that no question of law arose for interference. The remand direction for fresh assessment was therefore upheld. en-us Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jan 2015 11:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168078 The disputed turnover was supported by bills and vouchers, and the Revenue's own communication indicated an intra-State sale. The Tax Board did not itself finally determine tax liability; it remanded the matter for de novo assessment after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The Rajasthan High Court found no perversity or legal error in that course and held that no question of law arose for interference. The remand direction for fresh assessment was therefore upheld. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168078