<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 394 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168062</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remanded the case to the assessing officer, allowing the present petitioner to participate in the assessment proceedings. The assessing officer held that the oxygen in question was not a raw material. The petitioner sought to challenge this assessment order through a writ petition. The court concluded that the petitioner could prefer an appeal under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, emphasizing the need for technical expertise in deciding the issue. The court dismissed the writ petition due to the availability of an alternative remedy under the Act, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to pursue legal remedies through the appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 394 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168062</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remanded the case to the assessing officer, allowing the present petitioner to participate in the assessment proceedings. The assessing officer held that the oxygen in question was not a raw material. The petitioner sought to challenge this assessment order through a writ petition. The court concluded that the petitioner could prefer an appeal under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, emphasizing the need for technical expertise in deciding the issue. The court dismissed the writ petition due to the availability of an alternative remedy under the Act, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to pursue legal remedies through the appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>