<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 612 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168054</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 15A(1)(a) of the U. P. Trade Tax Act was treated as unjustified where the assessee paid the admitted tax, later deposited the balance with interest, and the delay was short. The Court followed its earlier view that, once tax and interest for the delayed period are paid before penalty proceedings are warranted, further penal action is not called for. On that basis, the penalty confirmed by the Tribunal was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 612 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168054</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 15A(1)(a) of the U. P. Trade Tax Act was treated as unjustified where the assessee paid the admitted tax, later deposited the balance with interest, and the delay was short. The Court followed its earlier view that, once tax and interest for the delayed period are paid before penalty proceedings are warranted, further penal action is not called for. On that basis, the penalty confirmed by the Tribunal was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>