<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 610 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168047</link>
    <description>The court found that the impugned assessment orders were passed in violation of its directions and principles of natural justice. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the reassessment orders for the periods in question. The respondent was directed to conduct a fresh inquiry, providing the petitioner with copies of documents to be relied upon. If the documents were not available, the respondent could obtain them from the investigating agency and furnish copies to the petitioner. The court mandated completion of this process within twelve weeks and instructed the respondent to inform the petitioner if the documents were unavailable. No costs were awarded, and the connected motions in both petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 610 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168047</link>
      <description>The court found that the impugned assessment orders were passed in violation of its directions and principles of natural justice. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the reassessment orders for the periods in question. The respondent was directed to conduct a fresh inquiry, providing the petitioner with copies of documents to be relied upon. If the documents were not available, the respondent could obtain them from the investigating agency and furnish copies to the petitioner. The court mandated completion of this process within twelve weeks and instructed the respondent to inform the petitioner if the documents were unavailable. No costs were awarded, and the connected motions in both petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>