<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 565 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168045</link>
    <description>A revisional order passed without proper hearing and without application of mind was treated as unsustainable, but that did not eliminate the Tribunal&#039;s power to remand. Once those procedural and decisional defects were identified, the proper course was to send the matter back to the revisional authority for fresh consideration of the parties&#039; contentions and for examination of whether the assessment order involved illegality or irregularity within the scope of section 40 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. The Tribunal&#039;s remand was therefore upheld and the challenge to that order failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 565 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168045</link>
      <description>A revisional order passed without proper hearing and without application of mind was treated as unsustainable, but that did not eliminate the Tribunal&#039;s power to remand. Once those procedural and decisional defects were identified, the proper course was to send the matter back to the revisional authority for fresh consideration of the parties&#039; contentions and for examination of whether the assessment order involved illegality or irregularity within the scope of section 40 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. The Tribunal&#039;s remand was therefore upheld and the challenge to that order failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>