<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 188 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254989</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the applications for Condonation of Delay in filing appeals as the service of impugned orders through speed post was deemed invalid. The Tribunal directed the applicants to make a pre-deposit of the demanded service tax within eight weeks, with the balance amount being waived during the appeal&#039;s pendency. Compliance was required by a specified date, and the decision was pronounced in an open court session.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 09:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 188 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254989</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the applications for Condonation of Delay in filing appeals as the service of impugned orders through speed post was deemed invalid. The Tribunal directed the applicants to make a pre-deposit of the demanded service tax within eight weeks, with the balance amount being waived during the appeal&#039;s pendency. Compliance was required by a specified date, and the decision was pronounced in an open court session.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>