<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 185 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remands all appeals to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration in line with precedent, emphasizing the levy of service tax on the service component of composite contracts. The impugned orders are set aside, granting appellants a reasonable opportunity for a hearing. Consequently, all appeals are allowed via remand, with stay applications disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 09:42:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 185 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remands all appeals to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration in line with precedent, emphasizing the levy of service tax on the service component of composite contracts. The impugned orders are set aside, granting appellants a reasonable opportunity for a hearing. Consequently, all appeals are allowed via remand, with stay applications disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>