<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 179 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254980</link>
    <description>An efficacious statutory appeal under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was available against the assessment orders, and no exceptional ground such as lack of jurisdiction or a clear violation of natural justice was shown. The High Court applied the self-imposed restraint that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised where an effective alternative remedy exists, and declined to entertain the challenge to the assessment orders. The grievance of insufficient opportunity of hearing was also rejected because the record indicated notice and hearing had been afforded, and no clear denial of natural justice was established. The appellant was left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 179 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254980</link>
      <description>An efficacious statutory appeal under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was available against the assessment orders, and no exceptional ground such as lack of jurisdiction or a clear violation of natural justice was shown. The High Court applied the self-imposed restraint that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised where an effective alternative remedy exists, and declined to entertain the challenge to the assessment orders. The grievance of insufficient opportunity of hearing was also rejected because the record indicated notice and hearing had been afforded, and no clear denial of natural justice was established. The appellant was left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>