<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 176 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254977</link>
    <description>Refund of unutilised Cenvat credit was held admissible for service tax paid on GTA services used to transport exported goods from the factory to the port of shipment where the exports were on FOB terms. The export documents, including the shipping bill and invoice, showed that the place of removal extended up to the port of shipment, so the outward transportation formed part of the export transaction. On those facts, the GTA service qualified as eligible input service credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and denial of refund was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 09:19:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 176 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254977</link>
      <description>Refund of unutilised Cenvat credit was held admissible for service tax paid on GTA services used to transport exported goods from the factory to the port of shipment where the exports were on FOB terms. The export documents, including the shipping bill and invoice, showed that the place of removal extended up to the port of shipment, so the outward transportation formed part of the export transaction. On those facts, the GTA service qualified as eligible input service credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and denial of refund was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>