<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 174 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254975</link>
    <description>Equalised sales tax was treated as deductible from the transaction value while determining assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal followed its earlier final orders in the same appellant&#039;s case and other co-ordinate decisions recognising such deduction, and declined to depart from that view. Reliance on a High Court ruling dealing with proof of freight charges did not alter the position, particularly because the earlier Tribunal orders had not been challenged by the Department. The abatement claim was accordingly accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 174 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254975</link>
      <description>Equalised sales tax was treated as deductible from the transaction value while determining assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal followed its earlier final orders in the same appellant&#039;s case and other co-ordinate decisions recognising such deduction, and declined to depart from that view. Reliance on a High Court ruling dealing with proof of freight charges did not alter the position, particularly because the earlier Tribunal orders had not been challenged by the Department. The abatement claim was accordingly accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>