<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 172 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254973</link>
    <description>Classification as motor spirit requires satisfaction of both the prescribed flash point and actual suitability for use as fuel in a spark ignition engine. Flash point alone is insufficient, and mere potential for blending or incidental use does not establish the required suitability. Where no conclusive test report demonstrates suitability for spark ignition engine use, classification as motor spirit fails. The resulting demand cannot be sustained, and penalties consequential to that demand must also be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 09:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 172 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254973</link>
      <description>Classification as motor spirit requires satisfaction of both the prescribed flash point and actual suitability for use as fuel in a spark ignition engine. Flash point alone is insufficient, and mere potential for blending or incidental use does not establish the required suitability. Where no conclusive test report demonstrates suitability for spark ignition engine use, classification as motor spirit fails. The resulting demand cannot be sustained, and penalties consequential to that demand must also be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>