<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 171 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254972</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Cenvat credit on in-process goods need not be reversed, but credit on goods in stock must be reversed. The penalty under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was set aside due to the absence of mala fide intent by the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 09:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 171 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254972</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Cenvat credit on in-process goods need not be reversed, but credit on goods in stock must be reversed. The penalty under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was set aside due to the absence of mala fide intent by the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>