https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254968 The Tribunal upheld the decision to drop the penalty against the respondent under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Revenue's appeal, seeking penalty imposition based on the respondent's habitual offenses, was dismissed as the absence of specific findings precluded the application of Rule 25. The Tribunal deemed the cited case law irrelevant to the current scenario and rejected the alternative suggestion for penalty under Rule 27 due to lack of a specific prayer in the appeal. The impugned order dropping the penalty was upheld, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed along with the cross-objection. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jan 2015 09:12:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254968 The Tribunal upheld the decision to drop the penalty against the respondent under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Revenue's appeal, seeking penalty imposition based on the respondent's habitual offenses, was dismissed as the absence of specific findings precluded the application of Rule 25. The Tribunal deemed the cited case law irrelevant to the current scenario and rejected the alternative suggestion for penalty under Rule 27 due to lack of a specific prayer in the appeal. The impugned order dropping the penalty was upheld, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed along with the cross-objection. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254968