<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 149 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254950</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot allowed the appeal of the assessee solely on procedural grounds, remitting the issue of income discrepancy back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing necessary details for a fair adjudication and directed the assessee&#039;s representative to comply within 30 days to ensure a fair hearing before the CIT(A). Failure to do so would result in the CIT(A) deciding based on existing records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 06:31:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 149 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254950</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot allowed the appeal of the assessee solely on procedural grounds, remitting the issue of income discrepancy back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing necessary details for a fair adjudication and directed the assessee&#039;s representative to comply within 30 days to ensure a fair hearing before the CIT(A). Failure to do so would result in the CIT(A) deciding based on existing records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>