<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 557 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168004</link>
    <description>Belated filing of Forms C and F under the Central Sales Tax framework, together with an application for extension of time and circulars allowing consideration on sufficient cause, justified recalibration of interim tax protection pending appeal. The High Court modified the stay by directing deposit of 10% of the demand and keeping the balance in abeyance on furnishing security, instead of maintaining a stricter stay condition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 557 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168004</link>
      <description>Belated filing of Forms C and F under the Central Sales Tax framework, together with an application for extension of time and circulars allowing consideration on sufficient cause, justified recalibration of interim tax protection pending appeal. The High Court modified the stay by directing deposit of 10% of the demand and keeping the balance in abeyance on furnishing security, instead of maintaining a stricter stay condition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>