<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 599 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168002</link>
    <description>The writ petition was held not maintainable because the impugned assessment involved mixed questions of fact and law better examined under the fiscal statute, and a statutory appeal was available under Section 82 of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The Court also noted that disputes between government instrumentalities should first be taken to the designated committee mechanism rather than raised directly in writ proceedings. A plea of breach of natural justice based only on refusal of adjournment was not treated as sufficient to bypass the statutory remedy, and the petition was rejected at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 599 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168002</link>
      <description>The writ petition was held not maintainable because the impugned assessment involved mixed questions of fact and law better examined under the fiscal statute, and a statutory appeal was available under Section 82 of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The Court also noted that disputes between government instrumentalities should first be taken to the designated committee mechanism rather than raised directly in writ proceedings. A plea of breach of natural justice based only on refusal of adjournment was not treated as sufficient to bypass the statutory remedy, and the petition was rejected at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>