<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 598 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167999</link>
    <description>Eligibility for sales tax incentive under clause 2(f) of the Sales Tax Incentive Scheme, 1989 depends on a factual finding on whether job-work production is of the kind covered by the scheme and can be counted toward increased production. Where the nature of third-party job-work has not been established before the revenue authorities, an assessment treating the assessee as ineligible is premature. The assessing authority must examine the evidence, determine the character of the job-work, and then decide entitlement after hearing the assessee. The impugned assessment was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration on the factual issue governing the incentive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 598 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167999</link>
      <description>Eligibility for sales tax incentive under clause 2(f) of the Sales Tax Incentive Scheme, 1989 depends on a factual finding on whether job-work production is of the kind covered by the scheme and can be counted toward increased production. Where the nature of third-party job-work has not been established before the revenue authorities, an assessment treating the assessee as ineligible is premature. The assessing authority must examine the evidence, determine the character of the job-work, and then decide entitlement after hearing the assessee. The impugned assessment was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration on the factual issue governing the incentive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>