<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 147 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167983</link>
    <description>In classification under the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, the undefined term &quot;utensils&quot; in Schedule II was construed in its common parlance and ordinary commercial sense. The Court treated the entry as broad and inclusive, covering household articles such as water jugs, lunch boxes, casseroles, stainless steel flasks, thermos flasks, trays, plastic bottles and similar containers used for preparing, serving or storing food and beverages. It held that the residuary entry applies only when goods do not fit a specific entry, and rejected the Commissioner&#039;s restrictive reading that limited utensils to kitchen items alone. The classification order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 147 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167983</link>
      <description>In classification under the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, the undefined term &quot;utensils&quot; in Schedule II was construed in its common parlance and ordinary commercial sense. The Court treated the entry as broad and inclusive, covering household articles such as water jugs, lunch boxes, casseroles, stainless steel flasks, thermos flasks, trays, plastic bottles and similar containers used for preparing, serving or storing food and beverages. It held that the residuary entry applies only when goods do not fit a specific entry, and rejected the Commissioner&#039;s restrictive reading that limited utensils to kitchen items alone. The classification order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>