<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 595 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167969</link>
    <description>Processing bulk paper by cutting, perforating, printing rows, columns and logos, and inserting carbon sheets produces commercially distinct computer stationery rather than the original paper. The finished product has a separate identity and use, so second-sale exemption is unavailable; the contrary claim also conflicts with treating the goods as manufactured products. The rebate under entry 106 is confined to tax paid on paper used to manufacture notebooks. Computer printing paper containing printed matter, perforations and embedded carbon paper is not a notebook, so the rebate cannot be extended by analogy. The assessments consequently remain taxable at the full rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 595 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167969</link>
      <description>Processing bulk paper by cutting, perforating, printing rows, columns and logos, and inserting carbon sheets produces commercially distinct computer stationery rather than the original paper. The finished product has a separate identity and use, so second-sale exemption is unavailable; the contrary claim also conflicts with treating the goods as manufactured products. The rebate under entry 106 is confined to tax paid on paper used to manufacture notebooks. Computer printing paper containing printed matter, perforations and embedded carbon paper is not a notebook, so the rebate cannot be extended by analogy. The assessments consequently remain taxable at the full rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>