<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 906 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167942</link>
    <description>The second proviso to section 15-1A of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 excluded tax payable on sales covered by entry 18 of Schedule C, Part I from the computation of additional tax. As the goods sold fell within that entry, those sales could not be taken into account for additional tax purposes. The document therefore states that inclusion of such sales was impermissible and that the issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 906 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167942</link>
      <description>The second proviso to section 15-1A of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 excluded tax payable on sales covered by entry 18 of Schedule C, Part I from the computation of additional tax. As the goods sold fell within that entry, those sales could not be taken into account for additional tax purposes. The document therefore states that inclusion of such sales was impermissible and that the issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>