<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1058 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167926</link>
    <description>Conditional tax rebates under the U.P. Trade Tax Act may be limited to manufacturers located in specified backward districts and using fly-ash sourced from thermal power stations within the State. Such conditions constitute a fiscal concession rather than a tax burden and may rest on a reasonable classification when they rationally promote industrial activity in backward areas and utilisation of State-generated fly-ash. Article 304 does not preclude this form of conditional concession merely because units outside the notified districts cannot claim the rebate. The rebate conditions and the consequential demand to refund rebate already claimed were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1058 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167926</link>
      <description>Conditional tax rebates under the U.P. Trade Tax Act may be limited to manufacturers located in specified backward districts and using fly-ash sourced from thermal power stations within the State. Such conditions constitute a fiscal concession rather than a tax burden and may rest on a reasonable classification when they rationally promote industrial activity in backward areas and utilisation of State-generated fly-ash. Article 304 does not preclude this form of conditional concession merely because units outside the notified districts cannot claim the rebate. The rebate conditions and the consequential demand to refund rebate already claimed were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>