<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 471 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167895</link>
    <description>A composite manufactured product must be classified on the basis of the finished commodity as marketed, not on the separate character of its ingredients. Rich&#039;s Whip Topping, made through processes such as emulsification, pasteurization, homogenization, chilling and ageing, emerged as a distinct commercial product and could not be treated as a mere raw material or industrial input under entry 100(4) of Schedule IV. It therefore fell outside that entry and was taxable under the residuary Schedule V.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 471 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167895</link>
      <description>A composite manufactured product must be classified on the basis of the finished commodity as marketed, not on the separate character of its ingredients. Rich&#039;s Whip Topping, made through processes such as emulsification, pasteurization, homogenization, chilling and ageing, emerged as a distinct commercial product and could not be treated as a mere raw material or industrial input under entry 100(4) of Schedule IV. It therefore fell outside that entry and was taxable under the residuary Schedule V.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>