https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167891 A rehabilitation scheme sanctioned under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 required the competent State authority to examine the petitioner's claim for extension of tax exemption in accordance with that scheme. The High Level Committee could not refuse the claim on lack of jurisdiction when the State Government was the admitted decision-maker. As no decision had yet been taken after sanction of the scheme, the matter had to be reconsidered administratively, and coercive recovery under the assessment orders was stayed until the State Government decided the claim. en-us Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167891 A rehabilitation scheme sanctioned under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 required the competent State authority to examine the petitioner's claim for extension of tax exemption in accordance with that scheme. The High Level Committee could not refuse the claim on lack of jurisdiction when the State Government was the admitted decision-maker. As no decision had yet been taken after sanction of the scheme, the matter had to be reconsidered administratively, and coercive recovery under the assessment orders was stayed until the State Government decided the claim. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167891