<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 142 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167876</link>
    <description>Penalty for non-disclosure of turnover is not to be imposed mechanically where the assessee explains the omission on a bona fide belief that the sales were not taxable. The Madras High Court noted that, even if deliberate concealment is not a strict prerequisite under the penalty provision, the assessee&#039;s bona fides remain a relevant factor. Because the Tribunal accepted the explanation that turnover from sale of REP licences and exim scrips was omitted under a genuine belief of non-taxability, its deletion of penalty was upheld and the penalty was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 142 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167876</link>
      <description>Penalty for non-disclosure of turnover is not to be imposed mechanically where the assessee explains the omission on a bona fide belief that the sales were not taxable. The Madras High Court noted that, even if deliberate concealment is not a strict prerequisite under the penalty provision, the assessee&#039;s bona fides remain a relevant factor. Because the Tribunal accepted the explanation that turnover from sale of REP licences and exim scrips was omitted under a genuine belief of non-taxability, its deletion of penalty was upheld and the penalty was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>