<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1055 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167875</link>
    <description>Imported rectangular gold bars sold by banks were held to fall under the semi-manufactured gold entry in the Kerala VAT schedule, not the bullion entry, because the relevant HSN-based descriptions and schedule structure treated the categories separately. The classification-based tax assessment was therefore sustained. Penalty under section 67(1) was quashed because penalty is not automatic and requires deliberate defiance, conscious disregard, or contumacious conduct; here, the bank had disclosed turnover, paid tax at the lower rate under a bona fide classification claim, and continued to contest the issue in good faith.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1055 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167875</link>
      <description>Imported rectangular gold bars sold by banks were held to fall under the semi-manufactured gold entry in the Kerala VAT schedule, not the bullion entry, because the relevant HSN-based descriptions and schedule structure treated the categories separately. The classification-based tax assessment was therefore sustained. Penalty under section 67(1) was quashed because penalty is not automatic and requires deliberate defiance, conscious disregard, or contumacious conduct; here, the bank had disclosed turnover, paid tax at the lower rate under a bona fide classification claim, and continued to contest the issue in good faith.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>