https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167860 The court rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing a tax appeal due to the lack of a satisfactory explanation for the significant delay of 1,226 days. Consequently, Tax Appeal (Stamp) No. 2386 of 2012 was dismissed. The court emphasized the importance of governmental bodies adhering to legal timelines and providing detailed, specific reasons for any delays, highlighting that even the State must comply with the law. en-us Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jan 2015 08:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167860 The court rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing a tax appeal due to the lack of a satisfactory explanation for the significant delay of 1,226 days. Consequently, Tax Appeal (Stamp) No. 2386 of 2012 was dismissed. The court emphasized the importance of governmental bodies adhering to legal timelines and providing detailed, specific reasons for any delays, highlighting that even the State must comply with the law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167860