<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 660 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167858</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 8(5) of the Andhra Pradesh Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1987 was held to be unavailable where the assessee was not registered under section 6, had filed no return under section 7, and the assessment was made under section 8(3). Section 8(5) applies only to assessments under section 8(1), where an existing return is found incorrect or incomplete and escaped assessment is linked to wilful non-disclosure or evasion. By contrast, section 8(3) covers failure to register or failure to file any return, and the Act provided no penalty in that situation. The penalty orders were therefore without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 660 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167858</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 8(5) of the Andhra Pradesh Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1987 was held to be unavailable where the assessee was not registered under section 6, had filed no return under section 7, and the assessment was made under section 8(3). Section 8(5) applies only to assessments under section 8(1), where an existing return is found incorrect or incomplete and escaped assessment is linked to wilful non-disclosure or evasion. By contrast, section 8(3) covers failure to register or failure to file any return, and the Act provided no penalty in that situation. The penalty orders were therefore without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>