<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 145 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254946</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that there is no requirement to file additional applications for extension of stay beyond the initial period of 180/185 days. Stay orders granted by the Tribunal remain in force until the disposal of appeals, without the need for further extension applications. This decision aligns with a previous ruling from the Coordinate Bench at Ahmedabad, ensuring consistency and clarity in handling stay orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 145 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254946</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that there is no requirement to file additional applications for extension of stay beyond the initial period of 180/185 days. Stay orders granted by the Tribunal remain in force until the disposal of appeals, without the need for further extension applications. This decision aligns with a previous ruling from the Coordinate Bench at Ahmedabad, ensuring consistency and clarity in handling stay orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>