https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254943 The tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a detailed examination due to disputes over central excise duty on lift parts and service tax for erection, commissioning, and installation activities. The appellant's payment percentage disagreement with the Revenue necessitated further review based on insufficient documentation. The tribunal emphasized the importance of a thorough examination and set a four-month deadline for the adjudicating authority to determine levy incidence and quantum in accordance with the law, allowing the appellant a fair chance to present evidence. The appeal was allowed via remand, and the stay application was disposed of. en-us Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jan 2015 12:25:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254943 The tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a detailed examination due to disputes over central excise duty on lift parts and service tax for erection, commissioning, and installation activities. The appellant's payment percentage disagreement with the Revenue necessitated further review based on insufficient documentation. The tribunal emphasized the importance of a thorough examination and set a four-month deadline for the adjudicating authority to determine levy incidence and quantum in accordance with the law, allowing the appellant a fair chance to present evidence. The appeal was allowed via remand, and the stay application was disposed of. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254943