https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254942 The tribunal allowed the appeal against the demand of Service Tax, interest, and penalty, as the appellant demonstrated the utilization of services at the relevant unit despite invoices being in the name of the head office or another unit. The tribunal emphasized that the actual receipt of services was not in dispute and ruled in favor of the appellant, highlighting that the denial of credit was solely due to procedural issues with the invoices. The decision was made after considering the appellant's evidence and relevant legal precedents, ultimately leading to the allowance of the appeal. en-us Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254942 The tribunal allowed the appeal against the demand of Service Tax, interest, and penalty, as the appellant demonstrated the utilization of services at the relevant unit despite invoices being in the name of the head office or another unit. The tribunal emphasized that the actual receipt of services was not in dispute and ruled in favor of the appellant, highlighting that the denial of credit was solely due to procedural issues with the invoices. The decision was made after considering the appellant's evidence and relevant legal precedents, ultimately leading to the allowance of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254942