<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 138 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254939</link>
    <description>Fees received for laying optical fibre cables were treated as part of the works contract cost connected with railway projects, rather than as consideration for Business Support Service. On that prima facie view, the activity was considered not appropriately classifiable under Business Support Service for Service Tax purposes, because the underlying work was seen as works contract in relation to railways. A prima facie case was therefore found in favour of the appellant, and recovery of the disputed dues was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 12:23:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 138 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254939</link>
      <description>Fees received for laying optical fibre cables were treated as part of the works contract cost connected with railway projects, rather than as consideration for Business Support Service. On that prima facie view, the activity was considered not appropriately classifiable under Business Support Service for Service Tax purposes, because the underlying work was seen as works contract in relation to railways. A prima facie case was therefore found in favour of the appellant, and recovery of the disputed dues was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>