<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 137 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254938</link>
    <description>Service tax demand confirmed under multiple service categories required reconsideration because the record did not clearly show the liability separately attributable to each category. In the absence of distinct confirmation for each head, the matter was considered fit for fresh adjudication by the authority below. No view was expressed on the merits, all issues were left open, and the matter was remitted for a fresh decision after compliance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 12:22:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 137 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254938</link>
      <description>Service tax demand confirmed under multiple service categories required reconsideration because the record did not clearly show the liability separately attributable to each category. In the absence of distinct confirmation for each head, the matter was considered fit for fresh adjudication by the authority below. No view was expressed on the merits, all issues were left open, and the matter was remitted for a fresh decision after compliance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>