<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 130 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254931</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the miscellaneous applications seeking recall of the final order dated 15.2.2013, restoration of appeals for fresh hearing, permission for the Department to produce additional evidence, and validity of the extended period of limitation. Revenue failed to establish fraud and the extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified. The applications were found to be misconceived and were accordingly rejected, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 130 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254931</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the miscellaneous applications seeking recall of the final order dated 15.2.2013, restoration of appeals for fresh hearing, permission for the Department to produce additional evidence, and validity of the extended period of limitation. Revenue failed to establish fraud and the extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified. The applications were found to be misconceived and were accordingly rejected, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>