<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 957 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167843</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 15A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was held unsustainable because the declaration form required under section 28A had already been obtained before the goods crossed the check-post and was produced immediately when the omission was pointed out. The lapse was treated as a failure to produce the form at the check-post at the relevant time, not as import of goods in contravention of section 28A. On that basis, the penalty orders could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 957 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167843</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 15A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was held unsustainable because the declaration form required under section 28A had already been obtained before the goods crossed the check-post and was produced immediately when the omission was pointed out. The lapse was treated as a failure to produce the form at the check-post at the relevant time, not as import of goods in contravention of section 28A. On that basis, the penalty orders could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>