<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 709 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167834</link>
    <description>An unamended tax entry describing &quot;moulded plastic footwears&quot; was construed broadly to include both single-mould and multi-mould footwear, because the original wording contained no distinction or exclusion. A later amendment expressly referring to footwear &quot;whether of single mould or more than one mould&quot; was treated as clarificatory rather than as creating a new coverage. An administrative clarification under section 56(3) could not narrow the plain scope of the earlier entry. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the goods remained taxable at four per cent before 1 January 2007 was upheld, and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 709 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167834</link>
      <description>An unamended tax entry describing &quot;moulded plastic footwears&quot; was construed broadly to include both single-mould and multi-mould footwear, because the original wording contained no distinction or exclusion. A later amendment expressly referring to footwear &quot;whether of single mould or more than one mould&quot; was treated as clarificatory rather than as creating a new coverage. An administrative clarification under section 56(3) could not narrow the plain scope of the earlier entry. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the goods remained taxable at four per cent before 1 January 2007 was upheld, and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>