https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167831 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a tax dispute case. The court found the petitioner not liable for purchase or entry tax as the materials purchased were for business expansion, not new unit establishment. The court quashed the tax order, emphasizing that the authority misapplied the law and there was no factual adjudication. The court allowed the petition, highlighting that dismissal based on alternative remedies was unjust when the authority's decision was legally flawed. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jan 2015 11:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167831 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a tax dispute case. The court found the petitioner not liable for purchase or entry tax as the materials purchased were for business expansion, not new unit establishment. The court quashed the tax order, emphasizing that the authority misapplied the law and there was no factual adjudication. The court allowed the petition, highlighting that dismissal based on alternative remedies was unjust when the authority's decision was legally flawed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167831