https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167824 A revisional order under section 34 of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was validly exercised against an assessment order passed after remand, because that order was an independent assessment order and not barred by the fact that an earlier appellate order had been made by a senior appellate authority. The prior appellate decision did not curtail the statutory revisional power over the later assessment made by the Assessing Authority. The Tribunal's order setting aside the revision was therefore unsustainable. en-us Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167824 A revisional order under section 34 of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was validly exercised against an assessment order passed after remand, because that order was an independent assessment order and not barred by the fact that an earlier appellate order had been made by a senior appellate authority. The prior appellate decision did not curtail the statutory revisional power over the later assessment made by the Assessing Authority. The Tribunal's order setting aside the revision was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167824