<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 446 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167822</link>
    <description>A writ court should not issue a blanket direction to prevent interference with transport of empty bottles to other States where the prayer is vague and unsupported by a specific, substantiated case of arbitrary action. The Madras HC noted that general and unspecified relief is not maintainable in writ jurisdiction, while preserving the petitioners&#039; right to challenge any future proceedings if they are taken contrary to law and principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 446 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167822</link>
      <description>A writ court should not issue a blanket direction to prevent interference with transport of empty bottles to other States where the prayer is vague and unsupported by a specific, substantiated case of arbitrary action. The Madras HC noted that general and unspecified relief is not maintainable in writ jurisdiction, while preserving the petitioners&#039; right to challenge any future proceedings if they are taken contrary to law and principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>