https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167818 Writ petitions challenging tax penalty and demand orders were not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the sales tax enactments. The High Court applied the settled rule that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily declined when an effective alternative remedy exists, and relegated the petitioner to the appellate forum. The interim protection against recovery was continued to preserve the appeal remedy. en-us Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167818 Writ petitions challenging tax penalty and demand orders were not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the sales tax enactments. The High Court applied the settled rule that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily declined when an effective alternative remedy exists, and relegated the petitioner to the appellate forum. The interim protection against recovery was continued to preserve the appeal remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167818