<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 445 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167813</link>
    <description>The court upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision to issue a conditional stay order requiring the petitioner to pay a portion of the outstanding tax amount and provide security. The court deemed the order valid and justified due to the substantial amount owed. Additionally, the court declined to consider the petitioner&#039;s revision application challenging the stay order, noting that no provision of law allowed for such a filing before the same authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 445 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167813</link>
      <description>The court upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision to issue a conditional stay order requiring the petitioner to pay a portion of the outstanding tax amount and provide security. The court deemed the order valid and justified due to the substantial amount owed. Additionally, the court declined to consider the petitioner&#039;s revision application challenging the stay order, noting that no provision of law allowed for such a filing before the same authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>