<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 705 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167804</link>
    <description>Service tax demands on recipients of services from abroad, including business auxiliary services, were examined in light of section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 becoming effective from 18 April 2006. The court did not decide the taxability question on merits for either the pre- or post-18 April 2006 periods. Instead, it directed the adjudicating authority to grant a full hearing, consider the petitioners&#039; submissions and the cited High Court and Supreme Court authorities, and then decide the show-cause proceedings afresh in accordance with law. All contentions, including the sustainability of the demands, were left open for adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 705 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167804</link>
      <description>Service tax demands on recipients of services from abroad, including business auxiliary services, were examined in light of section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 becoming effective from 18 April 2006. The court did not decide the taxability question on merits for either the pre- or post-18 April 2006 periods. Instead, it directed the adjudicating authority to grant a full hearing, consider the petitioners&#039; submissions and the cited High Court and Supreme Court authorities, and then decide the show-cause proceedings afresh in accordance with law. All contentions, including the sustainability of the demands, were left open for adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>