<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 461 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167795</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 12(3)(b) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was held unjustified where the assessee had fully disclosed the transactions in its books and there was no finding of wilful suppression or concealment. The disallowance of the exemption claim by itself did not justify penalty. Applying the same principle recognised under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, the Court treated penalty as dependent on a clear finding of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. In the absence of such a finding, the Revenue&#039;s revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 461 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167795</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 12(3)(b) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was held unjustified where the assessee had fully disclosed the transactions in its books and there was no finding of wilful suppression or concealment. The disallowance of the exemption claim by itself did not justify penalty. Applying the same principle recognised under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, the Court treated penalty as dependent on a clear finding of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. In the absence of such a finding, the Revenue&#039;s revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>