<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 968 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167782</link>
    <description>A statutory development authority created by the State for planned urban development was treated as a government-linked authority rather than a private entity for sales tax notification purposes. Because its constitution, administration and supervision were controlled by the State Government, supplies made to it qualified for the concessional rate extended to governmental or statutory bodies. The revisional authority&#039;s denial of that benefit was therefore found unsustainable, and the assessee retained concessional tax treatment on the sales in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 968 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167782</link>
      <description>A statutory development authority created by the State for planned urban development was treated as a government-linked authority rather than a private entity for sales tax notification purposes. Because its constitution, administration and supervision were controlled by the State Government, supplies made to it qualified for the concessional rate extended to governmental or statutory bodies. The revisional authority&#039;s denial of that benefit was therefore found unsustainable, and the assessee retained concessional tax treatment on the sales in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>