<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 860 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167780</link>
    <description>A revisional order rejecting concessional tax treatment on inter-State sales was vitiated because the authority did not properly consider the assessee&#039;s reply to the show-cause notice and supporting material. The assessee had relied on a letter from the purchasing dealer&#039;s assessing authority stating that the relevant C forms were issued by the department, but the impugned order failed to deal with this specific contention. The HC held that such non-consideration of material on record made the decision-making process defective. The revisional order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration on the merits after due examination of the reply and supporting letter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 09:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 860 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167780</link>
      <description>A revisional order rejecting concessional tax treatment on inter-State sales was vitiated because the authority did not properly consider the assessee&#039;s reply to the show-cause notice and supporting material. The assessee had relied on a letter from the purchasing dealer&#039;s assessing authority stating that the relevant C forms were issued by the department, but the impugned order failed to deal with this specific contention. The HC held that such non-consideration of material on record made the decision-making process defective. The revisional order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration on the merits after due examination of the reply and supporting letter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>