https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167771 Where seized survey material, loose papers and form F declarations were unclear and required fresh verification, a remand for re-examination was justified because the Tribunal, as the final fact-finding authority, could direct fresh adjudication when material facts remained uncertain. The High Court found no error in the Tribunal's decision to send the matter back to the assessing authority, and no interference was warranted in revision. The remand order was therefore sustained, as no question of law arose for interference on the facts presented. en-us Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167771 Where seized survey material, loose papers and form F declarations were unclear and required fresh verification, a remand for re-examination was justified because the Tribunal, as the final fact-finding authority, could direct fresh adjudication when material facts remained uncertain. The High Court found no error in the Tribunal's decision to send the matter back to the assessing authority, and no interference was warranted in revision. The remand order was therefore sustained, as no question of law arose for interference on the facts presented. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167771