<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 444 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167759</link>
    <description>Sale of laminated sheet scraps purchased from the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board under an exemption notification was held not taxable as a second sale under section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The second proviso to section 3(2) applies only to goods in the First Schedule that are taxable at the point of first sale, with tax chargeable on the first or earliest successive dealer. Where the assessee was not the first seller, its subsequent sale did not enter the charging net merely because the earlier sale had not suffered tax. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the exemption continued to operate for successive dealers was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 444 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167759</link>
      <description>Sale of laminated sheet scraps purchased from the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board under an exemption notification was held not taxable as a second sale under section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The second proviso to section 3(2) applies only to goods in the First Schedule that are taxable at the point of first sale, with tax chargeable on the first or earliest successive dealer. Where the assessee was not the first seller, its subsequent sale did not enter the charging net merely because the earlier sale had not suffered tax. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the exemption continued to operate for successive dealers was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>