<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 128 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254929</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Fuel and Ash Handling System supplied by the appellant did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE as it did not meet the criteria of being part of a waste conversion device producing energy. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the Annexure granting exemption to the appellant was valid and had not been canceled, thus ruling in favor of the appellant and setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 128 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254929</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Fuel and Ash Handling System supplied by the appellant did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE as it did not meet the criteria of being part of a waste conversion device producing energy. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the Annexure granting exemption to the appellant was valid and had not been canceled, thus ruling in favor of the appellant and setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>