<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 374 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167727</link>
    <description>A rehabilitation scheme direction to consider tax relief did not create an automatic or enforceable right to extension of sales tax exemption or concessional central sales tax. The Government had already examined and ? need English only. Let&#039;s craft proper. The Government had already examined the claim and rejected it, and the earlier writ proceedings had left the petitioner to pursue the matter before the Government. A prior Division Bench decision had also rejected the same claim for similarly placed assessees. The consequential assessment notices were not interfered with, as they had already resulted in final assessment orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 374 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167727</link>
      <description>A rehabilitation scheme direction to consider tax relief did not create an automatic or enforceable right to extension of sales tax exemption or concessional central sales tax. The Government had already examined and ? need English only. Let&#039;s craft proper. The Government had already examined the claim and rejected it, and the earlier writ proceedings had left the petitioner to pursue the matter before the Government. A prior Division Bench decision had also rejected the same claim for similarly placed assessees. The consequential assessment notices were not interfered with, as they had already resulted in final assessment orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>